Fuse.js (16k ⭐) - A powerful, lightweight fuzzy-search library, with zero dependencies. It allows you to perform approximate string matching on the client-side or the backend, without setting up a dedicated search service. You can use it to search through arrays of strings or objects, with different options for weighting, nesting, and extended search syntax.
FlexSearch.js (10k ⭐) - A next-generation full-text search library for Browser and Node.js with zero dependencies. It claims to be the web’s fastest and most memory-efficient search library, with features like contextual indexing, document indexing, web workers, and more.
Lunr.js (8.5k ⭐) - A small, full-text search library for use in the browser or on the server with Node.js. It indexes JSON documents and provides a simple search interface for retrieving documents that best match text queries. It is designed to be easy to set up and use, without the need for external search services.
Orama (5.8k ⭐) - A fast, batteries-included, full-text search engine entirely written in TypeScript, designed to work on any runtime and has no dependencies. Orama also supports plugins to extend its functionality and integrate with other frameworks.
Above libraries vary in their specific features and capabilities, but there are several common features that are often found across them:
It’s important to note that different search libraries may prioritize different features, and the specific implementation details may vary. It’s always recommended to consult the documentation and explore the capabilities of each library to understand how well they align with your project’s needs.
Full-text search is a comprehensive search method that compares every word of the search request against every word within the document or database. Full-text search can perform linguistic searches on text data, such as finding synonyms, stemming, or ranking results by relevance.
Full-text search can also support various types of data and queries, such as numerical, geolocation, structured, or fuzzy. Full-text search is often used to provide fast and user-friendly search experiences for web and mobile applications.
Client-side fuzzy searching is the technique of finding strings that are approximately equal to a given pattern (rather than exactly) on the browser, without relying on a server or a database. It can be useful for situations where you want to provide fast and user-friendly search experiences for small to moderately large data sets, and you don’t need a dedicated backend or a complex search service.
Server-side search services are tools or platforms that provide search functionality on the server side, usually by indexing and querying data stored in a database or a file system. Some examples of server-side search services are:
Elasticsearch: A distributed search and analytics engine built on top of the Lucene library. It offers real-time search, full-text search, and analytics capabilities. Elasticsearch is highly scalable, distributed, and can handle large volumes of data. It provides RESTful APIs and supports various query types, filtering, aggregations, and relevancy scoring.
Algolia: A cloud-based service that provides AI-powered search and discovery capabilities for web and mobile applications. Algolia search allows you to index and query various types of data, such as text, geolocation, numeric, and structured data. Algolia search also offers features such as autocomplete, typo tolerance, synonyms, facets, personalization, analytics, and more. You can use Algolia search by integrating with its API or using one of its InstantSearch libraries for different platforms.
Client-side search and server-side search are different approaches to performing search operations on data. The main difference is where the search logic and the data are located and executed. Client-side search runs on the user’s browser, while server-side search runs on a remote server.
Some of the advantages of client-side search are:
Some of the disadvantages of client-side search are:
Some of the advantages of server-side search are:
Some of the disadvantages of server-side search are: